![]() Yates FA (1964) Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. Williams B (1990) Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Wightman WPD (1972) Science in a Renaissance Society. Westfall RS (1980) Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Wallace WA (1991) Galileo, the Jesuits and the Mediaeval Aristotle. Urbach P (1986) Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal. Thijssen JMMH, Zupko J (eds) (2001) The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Shea WR (1972) Galileo's Intellectual Revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL/London. Shapere D (1974) Galileo: A Philosophical Study. Runciman S (1965) The Fall of Constantinople. Rothenstein J (1964) Francis Bacon: An Introduction. Porter R, Teich M (eds) (1992) The Scientific Revolution in National Context. Pitt JC (1997) Galileo, Human Knowledge and the Book of Nature: Method Replaces Metaphysics. Murray A (1978) Reason and Society in the Middle Ages. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, MO. McKnight SA (ed) (1992) Science, Pseudo-Science and Utopianism in Early Modern Thought. Lindsay D, Price MR (1975) Authority and Challenge: A Portrait of Europe 1300–1600. Lattis JM (1995) Between Copernicus and Galileo. Kenny A (1968) Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy. Henry J (2002) Knowledge is Power: Francis Bacon and the Method of Science. Hallyn F (1990) The Poetic Structure of the World: Copernicus and Kepler. Hall AR (1996) Isaac Newton: Adventurer in Thought. Hall AR (1983) The Revolution in Science 1500–1750. Black, Edinburgh.Įnglander D, Norman D, O'Day R, Owens WR (eds) (1979) Culture and Belief in Europe 1450– 1600. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.ĭreyer JLE (1890) Tycho Brahé: A Picture of Scientific Life and Work in the Sixteenth Century. ![]() Doubleday, New York.ĭrake S, Drabkin IE (1969) Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Heath and Co., Lexington, MA.ĭrake S (1957) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.ĭannenfeldt KH (ed) (1974) The Renaissance: Basic Interpretations. Faber, London.īuchwald JZ, Bernard I (eds) (2001) Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy. Thomas Yoseloff, New York.Īrmitage A (1966) John Kepler. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īrmitage A (1957) Copernicus, the Founder of Modern Astronomy. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Most importantly, the process of change was underpinned by a wider cultural transformation. The label ‘Scientific Revolution’ is not meaningless – the 16th and 17th centuries indeed witnessed a dramatic intellectual transition, as we indicated in Chapter 1 – but for the following reasons it can mislead:Ĭopernicus and his successors inherited the tradition of Classical learning that had continued, transmuted but unbroken, through the Islamic golden age and late mediaeval Europe (see Chapter 4 and below).Įuropean views of the natural world had not become entirely ‘modern’ by Newton’s time. The 143-year period between these two publications is usually known as the Scientific Revolution. In 1686, Newton published his Principia, which put a final nail in the coffin of Aristotle's physics. Traditionally, the ‘scientific worldview’ is said to have originated in Western Europe in 1543, when Copernicus's On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Bodies was published in Vienna - a book that not only introduced much of literate Europe to the notion of a ‘heliocentric universe’, but was also contrary to Aristotelian teaching.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |